Patent Infringement News

Acacia Prevails Over Yahoo in Patent Infringement Lawsuit; Awarded $12.4M

Submitted by patentadmin on Thu, 02/03/2011 - 09:15

February 3, 2010 - Acacia Research Corp.'s subsidiary, Creative Internet Advertising Group, received a $12.4 million judgment stemming from a May 2009 trial verdict in the company's patent lawsuit against Yahoo Inc.

A jury in the Eastern District of Texas found that Yahoo's messenger infringes one of Acacia's patents.

Surprising PwC Study Finds NPEs Awarded Largest Damages

Submitted by patentadmin on Tue, 01/11/2011 - 09:27

January 11, 2011 - For all the fuss about non-practicing entities (NPEs), and all the proposed patent reforms aimed at controlling them, they are still winning the largest damages awards on average in patent infringement cases.

That was the finding of the PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP's 2010 Patent Litigation Study, which also revealed that:

Microsoft Co-founder Paul Allen's Patent Infringement Lawsuit Dismissed

Submitted by patentadmin on Wed, 12/15/2010 - 09:27

December 15, 2010 - In August of this year, a company called Interval Licensing LLC (founded by Microsoft co-founder Paul Allen) sued 11 Internet giants - AOL, Apple, eBay, Facebook, Google, Netflix, Office Depot, OfficeMax, Staples, Yahoo and YouTube - alleging infringement of four patents. That lawsuit was dismissed on December 10.

Kodak Files Patent Infringement Lawsuit Against Shutterfly

Submitted by patentadmin on Wed, 12/15/2010 - 09:27

December 15, 2010 - Eastman Kodak Co. filed a patent infringement suit against Shutterfly Inc., an online photo sharing service, and has been sued in return.

Kodak alleges that Shutterfly infringes its patent(s), but did not specify which patents were infringed in its complaint, only that it is seeking an injunction plus damages, legal fees and other costs.

Verdict Reversed in Patent Infringement Lawsuit Between Western Union and MoneyGram

Submitted by patentadmin on Wed, 12/08/2010 - 09:27

December 8, 2010 - Last year, Western Union Co. won a $16.4 million verdict against MoneyGram in a patent lawsuit over a method of transferring money via telephone. Recently, the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (CAFC) reversed that ruling and found the Western Union patents invalid based on obviousness.